10 Best Healthtech Companies to Watch in 2026

TL;DR

• 1. Physitrack leads digital rehabilitation with exercise prescription, PhysiApp engagement, adherence tracking, telehealth, and remote monitoring.
• 2. Sword Health combines motion sensors, AI guidance, and clinician-led MSK care.
• 3. Hinge Health delivers enterprise MSK and pelvic health programs through employer benefits.
• 4. Tempus AI applies AI to genomic and clinical data for precision medicine.
• 5. Flatiron Health supports oncology care and research through OncoEMR and real-world data.
• 6. Maven Clinic provides virtual fertility, maternity, parenting, and menopause benefits.
• 7. Included Health combines virtual primary care with benefits navigation and specialty care.
• 8. Doctolib connects European patients and clinicians through booking, scheduling, and telehealth.
• 9. Ada Health provides AI-guided symptom assessment and triage.
• 10. Livi offers video consultations with primary care doctors across European markets.

What healthtech companies actually do

Healthtech companies build technology that supports clinical care, patient access, remote monitoring, and health data analysis. The category includes clinical software, virtual care services, connected monitoring tools, and AI platforms that interpret genomic, clinical, or patient-generated data. Some products serve patients directly, while others support clinicians, health systems, employers, insurers, or life sciences companies.

Healthtech products often sit alongside an EHR rather than replacing it. An EHR stores the clinical record, practice-management software handles scheduling and operations, and revenue-cycle tools manage billing and collections. Integrations allow a healthtech product to exchange data with those systems while performing a focused job such as exercise prescription, symptom triage, oncology analysis, or appointment booking.

Buyers evaluating healthtech companies in 2026 should identify which operational or clinical layer they need. A point solution addresses one use case in depth, while a platform combines several connected capabilities. Clinicians may prioritize usability and patient follow-through. Health systems often focus on integration, security, and deployment across sites. Benefits leaders need employee access and measurable program use, while investors may examine adoption, evidence, and commercial durability. Each perspective can produce a different valid choice.

How we selected and ranked these companies

We ranked each company against the same five criteria, while accounting for the different clinical problems and buyers each company serves.

• Verifiable adoption showed whether clinicians, health systems, employers, or patients use the product at meaningful scale.
• Clinical capability reflected both the range of supported use cases and the depth of tools within the company’s specialty.
• Integration and interoperability measured how well the product works with existing EHR, benefits, data, and operational systems.
• Published evidence helped us assess clinical outcomes, patient engagement, operational gains, and research value where relevant.
• A clear “best for” fit rewarded companies that solve a defined buyer problem without overstating their scope.

We weighted specialist performance more heavily than product breadth when a company led a specific category. An oncology data platform can therefore outrank a broader virtual care company for cancer research, while a focused rehabilitation platform can lead for connected care beyond the clinic.

We checked publicly available adoption, ownership, and customer figures against first-party or reputable sources at the time of writing. Buyers should confirm current product availability, pricing, and contract terms during procurement.

Physitrack — best for digital rehabilitation, patient engagement, and connected care beyond the clinic

Best for

Digital rehabilitation, patient engagement, and connected care beyond the clinic.

What it is

Physitrack gives clinicians a dedicated platform for prescribing home exercise programs and monitoring care between appointments. Its library contains more than 18,000 exercise videos, with content available in 14 languages. Clinicians can adapt programs to each patient rather than relying on static exercise sheets.

PhysiApp delivers prescribed programs through a patient-facing app. Patients can record completion, progress, and discomfort, while clinicians can review adherence and patient-reported outcome measures. These signals help clinicians identify problems and adjust care before the next appointment.

Telehealth and remote monitoring extend the same care plan beyond the clinic. In the United States, Physitrack supports Remote Therapeutic Monitoring workflows by recording qualifying activity, tracking clinician time, and assembling documentation for review. Eligible US workflows may involve CPT code 98975 for setup and patient education, device-supply codes 98976, 98977, or 98978, and treatment-management codes 98980 or 98981. A qualified clinician must determine whether the patient, device, recorded data, and treatment-management work satisfy the requirements for each code. Practices should verify coverage and coding with their billing and compliance advisers.

Physitrack uses AI to reduce program-building work while preserving clinical control. AI Exercise Search helps clinicians find relevant exercises using natural search terms, and the clinician still chooses what to prescribe. Sensor-free motion capture measures patient movement through a compatible camera without requiring wearable hardware.

EHR and EMR integrations place these capabilities closer to the clinical record. The established Raintree integration supports single sign-on, patient creation, program assignment, results review, telehealth access, and selected data writeback. Physitrack reports that more than 110,000 clinicians use its platform across 174 countries. Its integrations and centralized program delivery can support independent clinics, hospitals, and multi-site providers.

Pros

• The large, multilingual exercise library supports varied rehabilitation programs and international use.
• PhysiApp combines exercise delivery with adherence, discomfort, and outcome tracking.
• Telehealth, remote monitoring, AI-assisted search, and motion capture support hybrid care within one patient-engagement platform.
• EHR and EMR integrations can reduce duplicate work while keeping the clinical record in its existing system.

Cons

• Physitrack does not replace an EMR, scheduling platform, billing system, or practice-management product.
• Full pricing is not publicly listed, and enterprise buyers must contact sales for a quote.
• US RTM workflows require clinical oversight and do not guarantee coverage or payment.
• Organizations may need implementation work to configure integrations, shared protocols, and reporting across multiple sites.

Pricing

Physitrack offers a 14-day free trial. Subscription and enterprise pricing require direct confirmation from sales. Physitrack has published US pricing for an HEP and RTM bundle, but buyers should confirm the current per-user and per-patient charges directly with Physitrack before purchasing. Buyers should confirm current rates, contract terms, integration costs, and regional availability before purchasing.

Sword Health

Best for Self-insured employers and health plans seeking AI-guided, sensor-based musculoskeletal physical therapy as a covered benefit.

What it is Sword Health delivers remote physical therapy through digital programs that combine movement tracking with clinical oversight. Sword Health uses movement-tracking technology and software to assess exercise performance and provide feedback, with the available equipment and care model varying by program. Physical therapists use the resulting data to adjust care plans and support members remotely. Movement data can give Sword Health clinicians additional information when they review performance and adjust a member’s program.

Pros Sword Health combines guided exercise, movement feedback, and access to physical therapists in one remote program. Its benefits-channel model can help employers and health plans offer musculoskeletal care across a geographically dispersed population. Members can complete sessions at home without arranging an in-person visit for every interaction.

Cons Sword Health primarily serves populations through employer and health plan contracts. Independent clinics looking for exercise-prescription software for their own clinicians may find a clinic-facing platform more suitable. Access also depends on benefit eligibility, and digital care cannot address every condition that requires hands-on assessment or treatment.

Pricing Sword Health does not publish standard pricing for employer and health plan contracts. Buyers need a custom quote based on covered population, program scope, and commercial terms. Eligible members typically access the service through their benefits rather than buying an individual subscription.

Hinge Health

Best for: Large employers and health plans seeking digital musculoskeletal and pelvic health programs.

What it is: Hinge Health delivers virtual musculoskeletal and pelvic health care through guided exercise, movement-tracking technology, and clinical support. Physical therapists and other care professionals can adjust a participant’s plan based on progress and the services included in the participant’s program. Hinge Health serves benefits buyers rather than selling primarily as a clinic-facing exercise prescription tool.

Pros: The enterprise model supports broad employee or member populations through a single benefits contract. Hinge Health also covers a wider range of needs than a basic home exercise app, including musculoskeletal care and pelvic health programs. Its combination of movement technology and clinical support gives participants feedback beyond prerecorded exercise instructions.

Cons: Hinge Health may fit poorly when an independent clinic wants to prescribe its own programs and maintain the existing clinician-patient relationship through one connected-care platform. Employers and health plans also need to evaluate eligibility rules, clinical handoffs, engagement reporting, and integration with their wider benefits programs. Buyers should confirm current program availability, eligible populations, and contract terms directly with Hinge Health.

Pricing: Hinge Health uses contract pricing for employers and health plans rather than publishing standard per-user plans. Buyers need a sales consultation to assess program scope, eligible population, implementation costs, and contract terms.

Tempus AI

Best for: AI-supported precision medicine and genomic and clinical data analysis for health systems, oncologists, and biopharma companies.

What it is: Tempus combines molecular testing with de-identified clinical data and machine learning models. Its platform helps clinicians use patient-specific information when evaluating treatment options, while life sciences companies can use its datasets and analytical tools for research and drug development. Oncology remains a central focus, though Tempus also works across other disease areas.

Pros: Tempus brings sequencing, real-world clinical data, and analytical models into one commercial platform. Its model supports both clinical decision-making and biopharma research, which distinguishes it from patient engagement tools built around virtual visits, exercise programs, or ongoing care communication.

Cons: Tempus serves specialized clinical and research workflows rather than routine care delivery. Health systems may need technical integration, data governance review, and staff expertise before they can use its tools effectively. Buyers should verify current partnerships and product availability for their disease area and jurisdiction.

Pricing: Tempus does not publish standard platform pricing. Testing coverage and patient costs can vary by payer, while enterprise data and research agreements require custom quotes. Because Tempus AI is publicly traded, buyers and investors can review its latest regulatory filings for current revenue, commercial agreements, and material business updates.

Flatiron Health

Best for Oncology real-world data and EHR-based research infrastructure for cancer centers and life sciences companies.

What it is Flatiron Health develops OncoEMR, an oncology-specific electronic health record, and data products that organize clinical information for research. Cancer centers use its software for oncology workflows, while biopharma companies use de-identified real-world data to study treatments and support evidence generation. Flatiron Health is an independent affiliate of the Roche Group.

Pros Flatiron combines an oncology EHR with research infrastructure built around cancer data. Its specialized model can reduce the work required to convert routine clinical records into structured datasets for research and drug development.

Cons Flatiron serves a narrower market than general-purpose digital health companies. It does not provide home exercise programs, rehabilitation monitoring, or broad MSK care. Buyers should also assess integration requirements, data governance, and whether OncoEMR fits their existing clinical systems. Buyers should ask Flatiron Health for current information about participating practices, dataset coverage, and the patient populations represented in its data.

Pricing Flatiron does not present simple package pricing for its enterprise products. Cancer centers and life sciences buyers should request a proposal based on deployment scope, data access, integrations, and implementation needs.

Maven Clinic

Best for Employers and health plans seeking virtual women’s and family health benefits across fertility, maternity, parenting, and menopause.

What it is Maven Clinic combines virtual clinical care, care navigation, and educational support through a specialized provider network. Members can access relevant clinicians and care advocates without finding each service independently. Maven sells primarily through employers and health plans, so access depends on the benefit package available to each member.

Pros Maven covers several stages of reproductive and family health within one benefit. Its network model can help members find specialized guidance, understand available benefits, and coordinate care across services. The focused clinical scope gives benefits leaders a more relevant option than a general-purpose telehealth platform.

Cons Maven serves benefits buyers rather than individual clinics that need exercise prescription, adherence tracking, or rehabilitation workflows. It does not replace local clinical services, health plan administration, or an EHR. Employers should assess network availability, service coverage, and member eligibility in each country where they operate.

Pricing Maven provides pricing through direct sales rather than a standard public price list. Contract costs can vary with workforce size, selected programs, geographic coverage, and implementation requirements.

Included Health

Best for Large employers and health plans seeking virtual primary care, benefits navigation, and specialty support through one contracted service.

What it is Included Health combines virtual medical care with guidance that helps members understand benefits, find in-network clinicians, and access relevant specialty programs. Included Health was formed through the combination of Grand Rounds Health and Doctor On Demand. Buyers should request current membership and customer figures if scale affects their purchasing decision.

Pros The integrated model can reduce the number of separate services that benefits leaders manage. Members can receive virtual care and help navigating in-person options through the same benefit. Included Health suits populations that need broad access rather than support for one clinical condition.

Cons Included Health primarily serves employer and health-plan channels, so individual clinics may find limited value as direct buyers. Its platform does not replace an EMR, rehabilitation exercise platform, or practice-management system. Program availability can depend on the employer contract and member location.

Pricing Included Health does not publish standard enterprise pricing. Employers and health plans need a custom quote based on covered populations, selected services, and implementation requirements.

Doctolib

Best for: Patient appointment booking and practice scheduling for clinicians across Europe.

What it is: Doctolib connects patient-facing appointment booking with calendar management and telehealth. Doctolib operates in several European markets, including France, Germany, and Italy. Product availability and healthcare requirements differ by country.

Pros: Patients can find clinicians, book appointments, receive reminders, and access video consultations through one service. Clinics can use the scheduling tools to manage availability and reduce manual booking work. Doctolib fits buyers seeking administrative access tools rather than clinical treatment software.

Cons: Doctolib does not provide exercise prescription, rehabilitation monitoring, or home exercise engagement comparable with Physitrack. Its geographic concentration also makes it less suitable for buyers outside supported European markets. Buyers should confirm current country coverage and user-scale claims directly because both may change.

Pricing: Doctolib pricing varies by product and jurisdiction. Buyers should request local pricing and check implementation requirements, contract terms, and applicable national regulations.

Ada Health

Best for AI symptom assessment and triage for patients and health systems.

What it is Ada Health uses an adaptive symptom questionnaire to collect information about a patient’s symptoms and medical history. Its software then presents possible causes and guidance on an appropriate level of care. The assessment supports triage rather than providing a confirmed diagnosis. Health systems can use Ada to direct patients toward suitable services, while payers and public health organizations can use it as a digital entry point for care.

Pros Ada gives patients structured guidance before a consultation and can help health systems route demand toward the right care setting. Its assessment model can support multiple clinical pathways without requiring a live consultation for every initial inquiry.

Cons Ada does not provide ongoing rehabilitation, prescribed exercise programs, or adherence monitoring. Clinical staff still need to assess patients and confirm diagnoses. Buyers should verify current ownership, supported countries, language coverage, and partnership claims during procurement.

Pricing Enterprise pricing depends on the deployment and requires direct contact with Ada Health. Buyers should confirm current consumer access terms and implementation costs separately.

Livi

Best for: On-demand GP video consultations within European public and private healthcare systems.

What it is: Livi provides app-based video appointments with GPs and other clinicians. Kry operates under different brands and service models across European markets, including the Livi brand in the UK and France. Appointment routes and service availability differ by country. Patients typically use the service for primary-care concerns, prescriptions, referrals, and follow-up care where local rules permit.

Pros: Livi gives patients remote access to primary care without requiring travel to a clinic. Its model can support publicly funded pathways and private consultations, depending on the country and local healthcare contracts. The service focuses on clinician-led consultations rather than automated symptom assessment alone.

Cons: Livi does not provide the exercise prescription, adherence tracking, or motion analysis needed for ongoing rehabilitation and MSK care. Patients may still need an in-person examination, diagnostic testing, or local specialist referral. Coverage and eligibility vary across jurisdictions. UK access depends on NHS or private service arrangements, while France, Germany, and Sweden apply their own clinical, prescribing, reimbursement, and data-protection requirements.

Pricing: Pricing depends on the country, payer arrangement, and whether the patient uses a public or private pathway. Buyers should confirm current commercial terms and local regulatory requirements with Kry/Livi.

Comparison at a glance

Why Physitrack leads this list

Physitrack leads because it connects clinical rehabilitation plans with what patients do between appointments. Clinicians can prescribe programs, monitor adherence and patient-reported outcomes, communicate remotely, and adjust care using one patient-engagement platform. AI Exercise Search and sensor-free motion capture add practical support while keeping clinical decisions with the clinician.

Physitrack also fits into existing healthcare operations. EHR integrations connect rehabilitation workflows with the clinical record, while scheduling, billing, and practice-management systems remain responsible for appointments, claims, and financial reporting. Buyers can add Physitrack without replacing the operational software they already depend on.

Physitrack serves private practices, hospitals, enterprise rehabilitation groups, and community clinics, including providers that may treat VA-referred patients. Its centralized exercise delivery and patient monitoring can help clinicians maintain consistent programs and follow-up across those care settings. Specialist companies elsewhere on this list remain stronger for oncology data, symptom triage, or employer benefits, but Physitrack offers the clearest fit for digital rehabilitation and connected care beyond the clinic.

Explore Physitrack’s digital rehabilitation platform.

How to evaluate a healthtech vendor

Start by deciding whether you need a point solution or a broader platform. A triage tool, oncology data product, or benefits navigation service solves a defined problem. A connected care or rehabilitation platform supports an ongoing clinical relationship. Comparing these categories without a specific use case produces misleading results.

Check how each product fits your existing technology. Ask vendors which EHR or practice-management integrations operate today, what data moves between products, and whether users need duplicate entry. Health system leaders should test identity management and data exchange before committing to a large rollout.

Require evidence that matches your patients and intended use. Review study design, sample size, and comparison groups rather than accepting an outcomes summary. Clinicians should examine clinical utility, while benefits buyers should review engagement and utilization among eligible members.

Evaluate security under the rules that apply in each country. Buyers should ask where vendors store data, how they control access, and which subcontractors can handle patient information. Contract reviews should also cover breach response and data deletion.

Test whether the product can support multiple sites without adding excessive administrative work. Health systems should assess permissions and reporting across locations. Investors should examine customer retention, implementation capacity, and dependence on a small number of contracts.

Calculate total cost beyond the subscription price. Include implementation, integration, training, support, hardware, and internal staffing. A lower license fee may cost more when deployment requires extensive custom work. Clinicians should prioritize usability, while benefits buyers should examine member access. Every buyer should request references from customers with a comparable use case and deployment size.

FAQs

What is the difference between healthtech and digital health? Healthtech covers technology used across healthcare, including clinical software, connected devices, diagnostics, and data platforms. Digital health usually refers more narrowly to software-enabled care, monitoring, and patient engagement.

Is Physitrack an EMR? No. Physitrack supports exercise prescription, PhysiApp engagement, adherence tracking, telehealth, and remote care. It works alongside EMR, scheduling, billing, and practice-management systems rather than replacing them.

What should health systems prioritize when adopting new healthtech tools? Health systems should assess clinical evidence, security, interoperability, usability, governance, and total implementation cost. Buyers should also confirm that the product fits existing clinical workflows and can scale across sites.

How do RTM and remote monitoring differ across US and non-US markets? In the US, Remote Therapeutic Monitoring refers to a set of CPT codes for collecting and reviewing certain non-physiological therapeutic data and managing treatment. Medicare and other payers apply coverage, documentation, and billing requirements to their use. Outside the US, remote monitoring generally describes a care capability. Reimbursement rules and clinical governance vary by country.

What is the difference between a benefits-channel digital health company and a clinic-facing platform? Benefits-channel companies usually contract with employers or health plans and deliver care to eligible members. Clinic-facing platforms sell tools that clinicians use with their own patients, often alongside existing clinical and administrative software.